Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local No. 213, AFL-CIO-CLC (Krispy Kreme Division, Beatrice Foods Co.), 773 (1982)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local No. 213, AFL-CIO-CLC (Krispy Kreme Division, Beatrice Foods Co.), 773 (1982)
BAKERY, CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO WORKERS, LOCAL 213
Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local No. 213, AFL-CIO-CLC and Krispy Kreme Division, Beatrice Foods Co.Krispy Kreme Division, Beatrice Foods Co. and Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local No. 213, AFL-CIOCLC, Petitioner. Cases 9-CB-4595 and 9-RC13315May 7, 1982DECISION, ORDER, AND CERTIFICATION OFREPRESENTATIVEBY CHAIRMAN VAN DE WATER ANDMEMBERS FANNING AND HUNTEROn September 30, 1981, Administrative Law Judge John H. West issued the attached Decision in this proceeding. Thereafter, the Charging Party filed exceptions and a supporting brief, and Respondent filed an answering brief.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.The Board has considered the record and the attached Decision in light of the exceptions and briefs and has decided to affirm the rulings, findings,' and conclusions2 of the Administrative Law Judge and to adopt his recommended Order.ORDERPursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board adopts as its Order the recommended Order of the Administrative Law Judge and hereby orders that the complaint be, and it hereby is, dismissed in its entirety.I The Charging Party has excepted to certain credibility findings made by the Administrative Law Judge. It is the Board's established policy not to overrule an administrative law judge's resolutions with respect to credibility unless the clear preponderance of all of the relevant evidence convinces us that the resolutions are incorrect. Standard Dry Wall Producat Inc., 91 NLRB 544 (1950), enfd. 188 F.2d 362 (3d Cir. 1951). We have carefully examined the record and find no basis for reversing his findings.In adopting the Administrative Law Judge's credibility findings, however, we disavow his adverse inference based upon the General Counsel's failure to call former employee Napper as a corroborating witness. We note that Napper was equally available to Respondent to refute testimony in support of the complaint allegations as she was to the General Counsel to corroborate such testimony. In such circumstances, we have concluded that no inference should be drawn. HitchinerManufacturing Company, 243 NLRB 927 (1979).2 In view of the Administrative Law Judge's credibility findings that employee union activist Foote made no statements contrary to the holding in N.LR.B. v. Savair Manufacturing Ca, 414 U.S. 270 (1973), we find it unnecessary to consider Foote's status as an agent of Respondent.261 NLRB No. 114 CERTIFICATION OFREPRESENTATIVEIt is hereby certified that a majority of the valid ballots have been cast for Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local No. 213, AFL-CIO-CLC, and that, pursuant to Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the said labor organization is the exclusive representative of all the employees in the following appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment:All full and regular part-time production employees, packing employees, wrapping employees, shipping employees, sanitation workers and in store sales employees employed by the Employer at its 3920 Seventh Street Road and 3000 Bardstown Road, Louisville, Kentucky locations, but excluding all truck drivers, office clerical employees and all professional employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.DECISIONSTATEMENT OF THE CASEJOHN H. WEST, Administrative Law Judge: The charge in Case 9-CB4595 was filed by Krispy Kreme Division, Beatrice Foods Co. (herein called Krispy Kreme or the Charging Party) on June 5, 1980.' The complaint was issued therein on July 28. As amended at the hearing herein, it alleges that Bakery, Confectionery and Tobacco Workers International Union, Local No.213, AFL-CIO-CLC (herein called Respondent or the Union) engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the National Labor Relation Act, as amended (herein called the Act) in that, assertedly: (1) its agents threatened an employee of the Charging Party that he would be deprived of his pension because of his failure to support Respondent's organizational activity; (2) other employees of the Charging Party were advised of this by an agent of Respondent;(3) its agents caused the pension to be revoked; and (4) two of its agents told employees of the Charging Party that they would not have to pay union initiation fees if they submitted authorization cards to Respondent prior to the Board-conducted election. 2Respondent filed a timely answer denying the allegations made in the complaint.All dates are 1980, unless otherwise stated.' A...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
15 CFR 19.7 When will Commerce entities compromise a Commerce debt? | 26 USC 6504 - Sec. 6504. Cross references | Leonard F. Prescott, F. William Johnson, Peter Riverso, Appellees, v. Little Six, Inc., in Its Capac... | United States v. Mary Johnson Brooks, (8th Cir. 2000) | Sentencia nº 6174 de Consiglio di Stato November 19 2008 | sentencia nº 3739 de consiglio di stato, july 16, 2008 | Sentencia nº 769 de Consiglio di Stato February 12 2009 | Sentencia nº 5867 de Corte de Apelaciones de Talca Sala Primera March 14 2012