Beaird Industries, (2009)

Extract

---

Beaird Industries, (2009)

Beaird Industries, Inc.; and Beaird Company, Ltd. and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local Union 2297

Beaird Company, Ltd. and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local Union 2297. Cases 15–CA–17315, 15–CA–17355, 15–CA–17366, 15–CA–17424, 15–CA–17425, 15–CA–17484, 5–CA–17708, 15–CA–17804, 15–CA–17948, 15–CA–17982, 15–CA–17983, 15–CA–18002, and 15–CA–18012

July 21, 2009

DECISION AND ORDER

By Chairman Liebman and Member Schaumber

The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this case on the ground that the Respondents, Beaird Industries, Inc. (Respondent Industries), and Beaird Company, Ltd. (Respondent Company), have failed to file answers to the amended second consolidated complaint. Upon charges filed on various dates by International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local Union 2297 (Union),[1] the General Counsel issued a series of complaints and amended complaints against the Respondents.[2] The last of these, the amended second consolidated complaint, repeats allegations in earlier complaints that Respondent Industries violated Section 8(a)(5) of the Act, that Respondent Company violated Section 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the Act, and that Respondent Company is a Golden State successor

See the full content of this document

---