Burns and Gillespie, 434 (1962)

Extract

---

Burns and Gillespie, 434 (1962)

434 DECISIONS; OF NATIONAL LABOR 'RELATIONS- BOARD Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, and upon the entire record in the case, the Trial Examiner makes the following:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. Hearst Publishing Company, Inc. (Los Angeles Examiner Division), Los.

Angeles, California, is engaged, and at all times material herein was engaged, in commerce within the meaning of Section 2_ (6) and (7) of the Act.

2. Los Angeles Newspaper Guild, affiliated with Congress of Industrial Organizations, and Association of Classified Advertising Employees of the Los Angeles Examiner, unaffiliated, are labor organizations within the meaning of Section 2 (5) of the Act.

3. The allegations of the complaint, as amended, that Respondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices, within the meaning of Section 8 (a) (1), (2), and (3) of the Act have not been sustained by substantial evidence.

[Recommendations omitted from publication.] T. H. Burns and R. H. Gillespie d/b/a Burns and Gillespie and Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, A.F.L. Case No. 39-CA-215. July 29,1955 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION

On December 19, 1952, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, issued its Decision and Order in this case;' in which it found that T. H. Burns and R. H. Gillespie, d/b/a Burns and Gillespie, herein called the Respondents, had engaged in and were engaging in certain unfair labor practices affecting commerce and ordered them to cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative remedial action designed to effectuate the policies of the Act.

The Board thereafter petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to enforce its order against the Respondents.

In an opinion handed down on October 29,1953 z and a decree entered o...

See the full content of this document

---