Cement Masons Union 337, 261 (1971)

Extract

---

Cement Masons Union 337, 261 (1971)

Cement Masons Union Local 337, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada , AFL-CIO and California Association of Employers . Case 20-CC1014

May 4, 1971 DECISION AND ORDER

BY CHAIRMAN MILLER AND MEMBERS FANNING

AND BROWN

On December 8, 1970, Trial Examiner Henry S.

Salim issued his Decision in this case, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision. Thereafter, the Respondent filed exceptions and a supporting brief, and the General Counsel filed limited exceptions and accompanying briefs.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel.

The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Trial Examiner's Decision, the exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in the case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner.' ORDER

Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board adopts as its Order the recommended Order of the Trial Examiner and hereby orders that the Respondent Cement Masons Union Local 337, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, its officers, agents, and representatives, shall take the action set forth in the Trial Examiner's recommended Order.' I As we are satisfied that the handbilling in this case was inextricably linked with the unlawful picketing, we find it unnecessary to pass on whether the handbillmg would independently violate the Act if conducted under circumstances disassociated from other proscribed activity I In fn 37 of the Trial Examiner's Decision substitute '20' for '10' days.

261

TRIAL EXAMINER'S DECISION ISSUE

HENRY S. SAHM, Trial Examiner: This 8 (b)(4)(ii)(B) proceeding involves a real estate development project where new homes are of...

See the full content of this document

---