Extract
Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen, etc., 639 (1962)
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS, WAREHOUSEMEN, ETG.
APPENDIXNOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES639Pursuant to a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board, and in order to effectuate the policies of the National Labor Relations Act, we hereby notify our employees that :WE WILL bargain collectively with International Chemical Workers Union, AFL, as the exclusive representative of our employees in the appropriate unit described below, with respect to wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or other conditions of employment, and, if an understanding is reached , embody such understanding in a signed agreement.All production and maintenance employees of the Kenedy Compress Company employed at its Compress , exclusive of its clerical employees, professional employees , guards, watchmen, and supervisors as defined in the Act.KENEDY COMPRESS COMPANY,Employer.Dated---------------- By-------------------------------------(Representative ) ( Title) This notice must remain posted for 60 days from the date hereof, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No. 135, affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters,Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, of America, A. F. of L., and Marsh Foodliners, Inc.Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No. 369 of Muncie, Indiana, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, A. F. of L. and Marsh Foodliners, Inc.Cases Nos. 35-CC-28 and 35-CC-29. October 24, 1955 DECISION AND ORDEROn June 17,1955, Trial Examiner Louis Plost issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that Respondent Local 135 had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Literrmediate Report attached hereto. The Trial Examiner also found that 114 NLRB No. 108.Respondent Local 369 had not engaged in any unfair labor practices and recommended that the complaint be dismissed as to it. Thereafter, Local 135 and the General Counsel filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report together with supporting briefs. Local 369 filed a brief in opposition to the General Counsel's exceptions.The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the ex-, ceptions and briefs, and the entire record in the proceeding, and hereby adopts the Trial Examiner's findings, conclusions, and recommendations to the extent consistent with the findings, conclusions, and order hereinafter provided.1. We find, like the Trial Examiner, that Respondent 'Local 135 violated Section 8 (b) (4) (A) and (B) of the Act by its inducement of employees of the secondary employers, Strohm Warehouse and Cartage Company and Rolling Mills, Inc., not to handle goods destined for the primary employer, Marsh Foodliners, Inc., hereinafter called Marsh.' 2. Contrary to th...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
