Extract
Continental Can Co., Inc., 1042 (1962)
not appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act.' As the Petitioner does not wish to participate in an election in the larger unit, we shall dismiss the petition.
[The Board dismissed the petition.] 19 The Board has held that the mere establishment of a new plant does not of itself justify holding a separate election among the employees of such plant to determine their bargaining representative . Saco-Lowell Shops, 107 NLRB 590 ; Birdsboro .4rmorcast, Inc., 101 NLRB 22, 24.CONTINENTAL CAN COMPANY , INC., PLANT No. 11 and AMALGAMATED LITHOGRAPHERS OF AMERICA , LOCAL 22, CIO, PETITIONER. Case No. 21-RC-3362. November 24, 1954Decision and Direction of Election Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before Floyd C. Brewer, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds :1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act.2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain emp...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
