Extract
Covington Motor Co, Inc., 32 (1964)
DECISION AND ORDER
On November 20, 1963, Trial Examiner Robert E. Mullin issued his Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices, within the meaning of the Act, and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set'fo'rth in the attached Trial Examiner's- Decision. Thereafter, the Respondent filed exceptions to the Decision and a supporting brief.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Leedom, Fanning, and Brown].The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed.The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Trial Examiner's Decision, the exceptions and brief, and the entire record in the case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner.The Board adopts as its Order the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner.' I The Recommended Order is hereby amended by substituting for the first paragraph therein, the following paragraph:Upon the entire record in this case , and pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended , the National Labor Relations Board hereby orders that Respondent, Covington. Motor Company , Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall:TRIAL EXAMINER'S DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASEUpon a charge and an amended charge filed on May 6 and 27, 1963, by United Papermakers and Paperworkers, AFL-CIO, herein called Papermakers or Union, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board , by the Regional Director for the Fifth Region ( Baltimore, Maryland ), issued his complaint, dated June 27, 1963 , against Covington Motor Company , Inc., herein called the Respondent or the Company.. With respect to.the unfair labor practices, thecom-plaint sets forth the specific respects in which it is alleged that the Respondent engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8 ( a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended , herein called the Act. In ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
