Dowty 'equipment Corporation And Local 1227, United Electrioal, Radio & Maohine Workers Of America, C. I. O., 214 (1942)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
Extract
Dowty 'equipment Corporation And Local 1227, United Electrioal, Radio & Maohine Workers Of America, C. I. O., 214 (1942)
In the Matter of DowTY 'EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and LOCAL 1227,
UNITED ELECTRIOAL, RADIO & MAOHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O.Case No. C-3193.-Decided October 31, 1941 Jurisdiction: airplane equipment and accessories manufacturing industry.Unfair Labor Practices Interference, Restraint, and Coercion: anti-union statements.Company-Dominated Unions: first organization: organized and supported by officials of management and supervisory employees; meetings held on company time and property; financial assistance by use of vending machines in the plant-successor organization held merely a continuation of first dominated union and employer's domination of first organization carried over to its successor: organized while predecessor was still in existence and without any steps having been taken by the employer to mark a separation between the two organizations or to publicly deprive successor of advantage of apparently continuing favor of employer; election of officers on company time and property, three officers of predecessor becoming officers of successor; subsequent posting of notice of dissolution of predecessor by employer ineffective as to successor organization; employer indicated its approval of successor and its hostility to competing affiliated union by anti-union statements and by granting successor de facto recognition and by making material concessions to it.Remedial Orders: employer ordered to withdraw recognition from successor organization and to disestablish it as representative of any employees for collective bargaining.Practice and Procedure: agreement purporting to settle unfair labor practice involving domination of first organization given no effect in view of quick formation of successor organization and the support and assistance rendered it by employer.Mr. James C. Paradise, for the Board.Lauterstein, Winn, Spiller and Bergerman, by Mr. Joseph F. Fivnegan, of New York City, for the respondent.Mr. Sidney Gilbert, of Long Island City, N. Y., and Mr. Frankc Scheiner, of New York City, for the Union.Mr. Edward F. Platow, of New York City, for the Aircraft.Mr. Gilbert V. Rosenberg, of counsel to the Board.DECISION AND ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon an amended charge filed on April 10, 1942, by Local 1227,United Electrical, Radio & Machine W...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
