Electrical Workers Local 98 (Lucent Technologies), 1118 (2003)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Electrical Workers Local 98 (Lucent Technologies), 1118 (2003)
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 98 and Lucent Technologies and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO.1 Case 4-CD-1032
April 30, 2003 DECISION AND DETERMINATION OF DISPUTE BY MEMBERS SCHAUMBER, WALSH, AND ACOSTA This is a jurisdictional dispute proceeding under Section 10(k) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). The charge in this Section 10(k) proceeding was filed on June 14, 2000, by Lucent Technologies, Inc. (the Employer) alleging that the Respondent, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 98 (Local 98), violated Section 8(b)(4)(D) of the Act by engaging in proscribed activity with an object of forcing the Employer to assign certain work to employees Local 98 represents rather than to the Employer's own employees who are represented by the Intervenor, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO (CWA). The hearing was held on December 14 and 28, 2000, before hearing officer Donna D. Brown. The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. The Board affirms the hearing officer's rulings, finding them free from prejudicial error. On the entire record, the Board makes the following findings. I. JURISDICTION The Employer and CWA stipulated ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Terrell s Tuneup Pop Cd Reviews | Zetwick Sigurlaug A. | Research and Markets Travel and Tourism in Switzerland. | western north carolina loses culinary inspiration | Sentencia nº 558 de Consiglio di Stato February 03 2010 | sentencia nº 4020 de consiglio di stato, july 30, 2009 | Sentencia nº 3298 de Consiglio di Stato June 17 2008 | Sentencia nº 6339 de Consiglio di Stato, December 21, 2009