Extract
G.C. Lingerie Corp. of Alabama, 690 (1964)
DECISION AND ORDER
On December 13, 1963, Trial Examiner Jerry B. Stone issued his Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and 146 NLRB No. 86.G.C. LINGERIE CORPORATION OF ALABAMA 691 recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision. Thereafter, the Respondent and the Charging Party filed exceptions to the Trial Examiner's Decision and briefs in support thereof.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Leedom, Fanning, and Brown].The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Trial Examiner's Decision, the exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in the case, and hereby adopts the findings,' conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner with the following modifications.We agree with the Trial Examiner, for the reasons stated in his Decision, that Respondent, through Plant Manager Chavkin, violated Section 8(a) (1), (3), and (4) of the Act by refusing, on May 21, 1963, to consider Hazel King for reinstatement. However, we do not consider appropriate the recommended remedy as to King.On or about August 14, 1963, in an attempt to settle the case, Respondent reinstated King to a job other than, but substantially equivalent' to, the one she normally performed. The...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
