Extract
Griggs Equipment, Inc., 1152 (1959)
DECISION AND ORDER
On May 6, 1959, Trial Examiner James T Rasbury issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto The Trial Examiner also found that the Respondent had not engaged in certain other unfair labor practices and recommended that the complaint be dismissed with respect thereto `Thereafter, the General Counsel and the Respondent filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and supporting briefs The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed The rulings are hereby affirmed The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in this case,i and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner with the following modification 21 The Trial Examiner found that Waters' interrogation of Henry Karl, as to whether he had changed his mind about the Union, did not violate Section 8(a) (1) of the Act As this interrogation occurred against a background of union hostility and in context with other conduct herein found violative of the Act, including the subsequent discriminatory layoff of Karl himself, we find that this interrogation constituted interference, restraint, and coercion within the meaning of Section. 8 (a) (1) of the Act 31 The Respondent's request for oral argument is denied because the record and the exceptions and briefs adequately present the iss...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
