Extract
Janesville Products Division, 854 (1979)
Janesville Products Division, Amtel, Inc. and International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW and The Production Unit of Janesville Products,
Party in Interest. Case 30- CA4398February 21, 1979 DECISION AND ORDERBY MLMBERS JENKINS. MURPHY AND TRI ESDALEI On October 13, 1978, Administrative Law Judge Bernard Ries issued the attached Decision in this proceeding. Thereafter, Respondent filed exceptions and a supporting brief.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.The Board has considered the record and the attached Decision in light of the exceptions and brief and has decided to affirm the rulings, findings, and conclusions of the Administrative Lawv Judge and to adopt his recommended Order.ORDERPursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board adopts as its Order the recommended Order of the Administrative Law Judge and hereby orders that the Respondent, Janesville Products Division, Amtel, Inc., Janesville, Wisconsin, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns. shall take the action set forth in the said recommended Order.DECISIONBERNARD RIES. Administrative Law Judge: This matter was heard in Janesville, Wisconsin, on June 2, 1978. The complaint, denied by Respondent in all material respects, alleges that Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(2) by assisting, supporting, and interfering with a labor organization known as 'The Production Unit.' Briefs have been received from the General Counsel and Respondent.' On the basis of the entire record,2 my impressions of the witnesses as they testified, and the briefs, I make the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.I No appearance was entered at the hearing ,n behalf of.and no, brief as received from, the Production Unit. Paned in the complaint as a part\ in interest 2Certain errors in the trlanscript have been notled add arc herebh cwrrected 240 NLRB No. 109 I JURISDICFONRespondent, an Ohio corporation, engages in the manufacture of automobile body insulation in Janesville, Wisconsin. During the calendar year preceding issuance of the complaint, a representative period, Respondent sold and shipped goods valued in excess of $50,000 directly to points loc...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
