Jasper Wood Products Company, Inc. And United Furniture Workers Of America, Local 331, Cio, 333 (1945)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
Summary
Jasper Wood Products Company, Inc. And United Furniture Workers Of America, Local 331, Cio
See the full content of this document
Extract
Jasper Wood Products Company, Inc. And United Furniture Workers Of America, Local 331, Cio, 333 (1945)
In the Matter of JASPER WOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. and UNITED FURNITURE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 331, CIO In the Matter of JASPER WOOD PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. and UNITED FURNITURE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 331, CIO Cases Nos. 14-C-966 and 14-R-955, respectively.-Decided August 14, 1945 DECISION AND ORDER Pursuant to a Decision and Direction of Election of the Board,' an election was held on July 21, 1944, at Jasper, Indiana, to determine whether certain employees of the respondent desired to be represented by the Union for the purpose of collective bargaining. Having lost the election, the Union on July 26, 1944, filed Objections with the Regional Director, alleging that the respondent had engaged in unfair labor practices which affected the outcome of the election, and requesting that the election be set aside. The Regional Director investigated the Objections and issued his Report in which he found that the Objections raised substantial and material issues and recommended that a hearing be held. On August 31, 1944, the Board issued an Order directing that a hearing on the Objections be held. On August 23 and September 9, 1944, the Union filed charges, alleging that the respondent had engaged in unfair labor practices at the Jasper, Indiana, plant. On December 22, 1944, the Board issued an Order consolidating the above proceedings for the purpose of hearing and directing that a hearing be held on the Objections and on the charges of unfair labor practices.
On April 13, 1945, the Trial Examiner issued his Intermediate Report, a copy of which is attached hereto, in which he found that the respondent had engaged in, and was engaging in, certain unfair labor practices affecting commerce, and recommended that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action. He further found that the respondent did not engage in other unfair labor practices alleged in the complaint and did not interfere with the election, and recommended that the complaint be dismissed in these respects and that the Union's Objections to the election be overruled. The respondent, the Union, and the coinsel for the Board filed exceptions to the' Intermediate Report and supporting briefs. None of the parties requested oral argument before the Board at Washington, D. C., and none was held.The Board has reviewed the Trial Examiner's rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence, and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed.The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, all except...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
