Lakeshore Electric Mfg. Corp. And United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers Of America (cio), 804 (1946)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Lakeshore Electric Mfg. Corp. And United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers Of America (cio), 804 (1946)
In the Matter of LAKESHORE ELECTRIC MFG. CORP. and UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (CIO) Case No. 8-C-1875.-Decided April 6, 1946 DECISION AND ORDER On March 4, 1946, the Trial Examiner issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices, and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action designed to effectuate the policies of the Act, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter, the respondent filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and a supporting brief. The respondent's request for oral argument before the Board at Washington, D. C., was denied because it was not made timely, as required by the Board's Rules and Regulations.
The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the respondent's exceptions and brief, and the entire record in the case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner.' The Trial Examiner found that, on and after November 1, 1945, the respondent, in violation of Section 8 (5) of the Act, refused to bargain collectively with the Union as the duly designated bargaining representative of the respondent's employees in an appropriate unit. To remedy this unfair labor practice, the Trial Examiner recommended that the respondent be directed to bargain, upon request, with the Union. We agree.ORDER Upon the entire record in the case, and pursuant to Section 10 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Natio...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
U.S. v. Kowalczyk *, 974 F.2d 174 (11th Cir. 1992) | United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruth Louise Mcintire, Defendant-Appellant., 461 F.2d 1092 (5th Cir. 1972) | Barclay Home Products Inc. Et Al. Petitioners v Federal Trade Commission Respondent. 241 F.2d 451 D.C Cir 1957 | self-regulatory organizations; proposed rule changes: philadelphia stock exchange, inc., | Sentencia nº 4180 de Consiglio di Stato, September 28, 2011 | Sentencia nº 5381 de Consiglio di Stato, October 07, 2008 | Sentencia de Conseil d Etat October 26 2011 caso Conseil d État 4ème et 5ème sous-sections réunies 26/10/2011 329295 | Sentencia nº 3325 de Consiglio di Stato June 30 2009