Local 4, Int'l Brotherhood of Electric Workers, 958 (1960)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Local 4, Int'l Brotherhood of Electric Workers, 958 (1960)
in a separate building, but it is next door to the Employer's main building. Some of the office clerical employees in the wholesale drug division work in the New York City plant, while others work in the Brooklyn plant, but this geographical separation does not result in different employment interests. As the employees in the wine and spirit import division are merely a segment of the Employer's entire office force, they do not constitute a separate appropriate unit. We find, therefore, that a unit of all the office clerical employees in the four divisions of the Employer is appropriate.
Accordingly, we find that the following groups of employees in the wine and spirit import, pharmaceutical manufacturing, wholesale drug, and corporate divisions of the Employer's New York City and Brooklyn, New York, plants, excluding from each unit warehouse employees, salesmen,' watchmen, guards, and all supervisors as defined in the Act, constitute separate units appropriate for the purpose of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act : 6 (a) All office clerical employees; and (b) All production and maintenance employees, including doormen.[Text of Direction of Elections omitted from publication.] 6 Local 815 seeks to exclude wareho...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
For This Ohio Family Triplets Twice Is Nice | Rangers Coach Gives Sabres Plenty to Post On the Bulletin Board | Archbishop's Installation of Married Men Wasn't Divine | Man Who Collapsed During Council Meeting Released From Hospital, Recovering at Home | Sentencia nº 1830 de Consiglio di Stato, April 26, 2010 | COMUNICATO Rinnovo dell autorizzazione all immissione in commercio secondo procedura nazionale del medicinale «Dilti... | sentencia nº 2215 de consiglio di stato, april 22, 2008 | sentencia nº 96461 de corte de apelaciones de santiago sala cuarta june 21 2010