Local Union No. 249, 311 (1962)

National Labor Relations Board

Linked as:

Extract


Local Union No. 249, 311 (1962)

LOCAL UNION NO. 249 311 ganization which is seeking to represent them in a separate unit, the employees in each such group will be included in the overall group and their votes pooled with those of voting group (5),21 and the Regional Director conducting the elections is instructed to issue a certification of representatives to the labor organization selected by a majority of the employees in the pooled group which the Board, in such circumstances, finds to be a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining.

[The Board dismissed the petition in Case No. 10-RC-2846.] [Text of Direction of Elections omitted from publication.] MEMBER LEEDOM took no part in the consideration of the above Decision, Order, and Direction of Elections.

21 If the votes are pooled , they are to be tallied in the following manner : The votes for the unions seeking the separate unit shall be counted as valid votes , but neither for nor against the union seeking to represent the more comprehensive unit; all other votes are to be accorded their face value, whether for representation by the union seeking the comprehensive group or for no union.

General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 249,

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, A. F. L. and Crump, Incorporated. Case No. 6-CC-94. April 01, 1955 DECISION AND ORDER

On May 17, 1954, Trial Examiner Ralph Winkler issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter, the General Counsel and the Respondent filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and the Respondent filed a brief in support of its exceptions.

The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed.

The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions and Respondent's brief, and the entire record in the case and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner, with the following modifications.

We agree with the Trial Examiner to the extent that he found that ...

See the full content of this document

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company