Mclain Fire Brick Comipany And United Brick Clay Workers Of America, Affiliated With The American Federation Of Labor, (1941)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Mclain Fire Brick Comipany And United Brick Clay Workers Of America, Affiliated With The American Federation Of Labor, (1941)
RELATIONS BOARD In the Matter of McLAIN FIRE BRICK COMIPANY and UNITED BRICK CLAY WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFFILIATED WITH THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR Case No. C-1919.-Decided October 10, 1941 Jurisdiction: fire brick and clay products manufacturing industry.
Unfair Labor Practices.Interference, Restraint, and Coercion: discriminatory enforcement of company rule forbidding union activity on company property while permitting similar activity by company-dominated union, held to constitute interference, restraint, and coercion.Conmpany-Dominated Union: failure of employer to announce publicly and unequivocally to employees upon enactment of Act that it was severing all connection with labor organization established by Company prior to Act held to violate Section 8 (2) of Act.Remedial Orders: disestablishment of dominated organization ordered.Mr. Harry Brownstein, for the Board.Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, by Mr. John C. Bane, Jr., and Mr.Seward H. French, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for the respondent.Mr. Robert A. Wilson, of Washington, D. C., for the Union.Mr. Charles W. Schneider, of counsel to the Board.DECISION AND ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon an amended charge duly filed on May 6, 1941,1 by United Brick & Clay Workers of America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called the Union, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, by the Regional Director for the Sixth Region (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), issued its complaint dated May 8, 1941, against McLain Fi...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
telemarketing sales rule national do not call registry fees, | barbara langston petitioner v office of personnel management respondent. 395 f.3d 1349 fed cir 2005 | toco hills inc et al v rollins protective services company inc. 179 ga app 823 348 s.e.2d 65 1986 | 21 CFR 862.3320 - Digoxin test system. | avis relatif à l extension d un accord régional ile-de-france conclu dans le cadre des conventions collectives nationales des travaux publics ouvriers-employés te... | Sentencia nº 2237 de Consiglio di Stato, May 21, 2010 | Decisión de Tribunal Séptimo de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Control de Lara (Extensión Barquisimeto), de March 06, 2012 | Sentencia nº 277 de Consiglio di Stato, January 20, 2010