Extract
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., 977 (1962)
to the extent that such right may be affected by an agreement requiring membership in a labor organization as a condition of employment , as authorized in Section 8 (a) (3) of the Act. We will not discriminate in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment against any employees be-_ cause of membership in or activity on behalf of any such labor organization.
ANCHOR ROME MILLS, INC.,Employer.Dated---------------- By---------------------------------------------(Representative ) (Title) This notice must remain posted for 60 days from the date hereof, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION and LOCAL 1035, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL , RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS, CIO.Case No. 13-CA-1477. November 23,1954Decision and Order On November 30, 1953, Trial Examiner Eugene E. Dixon issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8 (a) (5) and 8 (a) (1) and recommending that the Respondent cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter, the Respondent filed exceptions to the Trial Examiner's Intermediate Report, the conclusions and finding therein, and rulings upon motions and objections made by the Trial Examiner at the hearing. The General Counsel filed a statement in support of the Intermediate Report and exceptions to its failure to make other requested findings and conclusions.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Peterson, Rodgers, and Beeson].The Board has reviewed the rulings made by the Trial Examiner at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions thereto, and the entire record in the case, and finds merit in the Respondent's exceptions.As described in the Intermediate Report, following a consent election, bargaining negotiations were begun between the Respondent and the Union the first part of March 1953. At that time, A. F. Siebert,Respondent's founder and president, was absent from the city on an extended business-vacation ...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
