General Motors Corporation Delco Products Division And Local 755, United Electrical, Radio And Machine Workers Of America (cio), 386 (1941)

In the Matter of GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION DELCO PRODUCTS DIVISION and LOCAL 755, UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERs OF AMERICA (CIO) Case No. R-2922.-Decided September 12, 1941 Investigation and Certification of Representatives: stipulation for Certification of Representatives upon consent election.

Mr. Philip G. Phillips, for the Board.

Mr. H. M. Hogan and Mr. Denton Jolly, of Detroit, Mich., for the Company,

Mr. Arthur L. Garfield, and Mr. E. J. Kraft, of Dayton, Ohio, for the Union.

Mr. Dan M. Byrd, Jr., of counsel to the Board.

DECISION AND CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES STATEMENT OF THE CASE On May 28, 1941, Local 755, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (CIO), herein called the Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Ninth Region (Cincinnati, Ohio) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of General Motors Corporation, Delco Products Division, herein called the Company, engaged in the manufacture of shock absorbers, electric motors, and automobile parts at Dayton, Ohio, and requesting and investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On July 31, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act, and Article III,

Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On July 30, 1941, the Company, the Union, and the Regional Director entered into a 'STIPULATION FOR CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES UPON CONSENT ELECTION.'

386 Pursuant to the stipulation, an election by secret ballot was conducted on August 14, 1941, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director among the following employees to determine whether or not they desired to be represented by the Union: all machinists and experimental model builders in the model shop of the Company, excluding foremen, assistant foremen, technical school students, and those employees receiving special training.

On August 16, 1941, the Regional Director issued and duly served upon the parties his Election Report on the ballot. No objections to the conduct of the ballot or the Election Report have been filed by any of the parties.

In his Election...