Extract
Nelson Maufacturing Co., 883 (1960)
gaining or other mutual aid or protection , or to refrain from any such activities, except to the extent that the right to refrain is limited by the lawful enforcement of a lawful union-security requirement.
WE WILL offer George W. Frangos and Calvin Le Cocq their former or substantially equivalent jobs, without prejudice to seniority or other employment rights and privileges , and pay each of them for any loss suffered because of our discrimination against him.APPLIED RESEARCH, INC.,Employer.Dated- ------------------ By------------------------------------------(Representative ) (Title) This notice must remain posted for 60 days from the date hereof, and must not be altered, defaced , or covered by any other material.Employees may communicate directly with the Board 's Regional Office, 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York , Telephone Number, Plaza 1-5500, if they have any question concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions.Nelson Manufacturing Company and International Union , Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO. Case No. 8-CA2569. September 25, 1960 DECISION AND ORDEROn April 9, 1962, Trial Examiner IV. Gerard Ryan issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that Nelson Manufacturing Company, herein called the Respondent, had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the attached Intermediate Report. Thereafter, the Respondent filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and a brief in support thereof. The General Counsel and the Charging Party filed no exceptions to the Intermediate Report.Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman McCulloch and Members Rodgers and Fanning].The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in this case, and hereby adopts the Trial Examiner's findings, conclusions, and recommendat...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
