Renner Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 1514 (1968)

Extract

---

Renner Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 1514 (1968)

Renner Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.

and Local Union No. 5, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO. Cases 5-CA-3897 and 5-RC-6069

August 13, 1968 DECISION AND ORDER

BY MEMBERS BROWN, JENKINS, AND ZAGORIA On May 16, 1968, Trial Examiner Thomas F.

Maher issued his Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices in Case 5-CA-3897 and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative actions, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision. In view of these findings and recommendations, he further recommended that the petition in Case 5-RC-6069 be dismissed and that all proceedings held in connection therewith be vacated. Thereafter, Respondent filed exceptions to the Decision.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with these cases to a threemember panel.

The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Trial Examiner's Decision, the exceptions, and the entire record' in these cases, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner.2 ORDER

Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board adopts as its Order the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner and hereby orders that the Respondent, Renner Plumbing,

Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., Winchester, Virginia , its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall take the action set forth in the Trial Examiner's Recommended Order.

' As the record estbalishes that an employee referred to by the Trial Examiner in part IV, C. 3, of his Decision as Carmine M Clark is actually Herman M Clark , the Decision is corrected accordingly Y In the absence of exceptions we adopt , pro jornm, the recommendation of the Trial Examiner that the authorization card of Harley Adams not be included among those supporting the Union 's claim...

See the full content of this document

---