Nelson-ricks Creamery Company, Employer And Teamsters, Chaitffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Union, Local 983, Afl, Petitioner, 204 (1950)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Nelson-ricks Creamery Company, Employer And Teamsters, Chaitffeurs, Warehousemen And Helpers Union, Local 983, Afl, Petitioner, 204 (1950)
In the Matter of NELSON-RICKS CREAMERY COMPANY, EMPLOYER and TEAMSTERS, CHAITFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS UNION,
LOCAL 983, AFL, PETITIONER Case No. 19-RC--30.-Decided April 5,1950 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before Howard A.McIntyre, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed.Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds:1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.2. The labor organization involved claims to represent employees of the Employer.3. No question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, for the following reasons:The Petitioner seeks to represent seven truck drivers who pick up milk at farms and haul it to the Employer's creamery at Rexburg,Idaho. The Employer contends that these drivers are independent contractors, not employees, and that the Board should, therefore, dismiss the petition.Each driver has a contract with...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Preakness Stakes [Derived Headline] | Poland Tries to Save U.S. Missile-Defense Deal ; Long-Term Arrangement Sought; Rice to Sign Czech Accord | embassy row [derived headline] | arab states raise doubts about al-maliki rice gets wary support for policy | sentencia nº 217 de consiglio di stato january 16 2008 | Sentencia nº 1879 de Consiglio di Stato, April 17, 2009 | Sentencia nº 4291 de Consiglio di Stato, July 22, 2008 | Sentencia nº 4958 de Consiglio di Stato October 01 2009