S. F. Typographical Union 21, 542 (1970)

Extract

---

S. F. Typographical Union 21, 542 (1970)

San Francisco Typographical Union No. 21 , International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO; Freight,

Construction, General Drivers & Helpers Union Local 287, International Brotherhood of Teamsters,

Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America;

and Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 85, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America and California Newspaper, Inc. d/b/a San Rafael Independent Journal . Case 20-CC-965

December 30, 1970 DECISION AND ORDER

BY CHAIRMAN MILLER AND MEMBERS BROWN

AND JENKINS

On August 17, 1970, Trial Examiner Allen Sinsheimer, Jr., issued his Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondents had engaged in and are engaging in certain unfair labor practices and recommending that they cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision.

Thereafter, the Respondents filed exceptions to the Decision and a supporting brief, the Charging Party filed an answering brief, and the General Counsel and the Charging Party filed limited cross-exceptions to the Trial Examiner's Decision.

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel.

The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Trial Examiner's Decision, the exceptions, cross-exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in the case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner with the following modifications:

In the limited cross-exceptions filed by the General Counsel and joined in by the Charging Party it is pointed out that by apparent oversight the Trial Examiner failed to find that when Montano of Teamsters Local No. 85 induced drivers of a neutral employer not to cross the secondary picket line of Respondent Typographical Union No. 21, and thereby involved the Teamsters Local No. 85 in the process of shutting down the pier, such conduct constituted a violation of Section 8(b)(4)(i)(B) as well as 8(b)(4)(ii)(B); 1 and, in the case of Respondent Teamsters Local 287, he failed to include in his recommended order a remedial provision aimed at its 187 NLRB No. 71 violation of Section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B). We find merit in these cross-exceptions and shall revise the remedial provisions accordingly.

ORDER

Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board adopts as its Order the Recommended Order of the Trial Examiner, as modified herein, and hereby orders that the Respondents, San Francisco Typographical Union No. 21, International Typographical Union, AFL-...

See the full content of this document

---