Extract
United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers, Etc., 572 (1958)
4. By such causation and by preventing Satchell from reporting for work on or about July 27, 1957, Local 10 has restrained and coerced Satchell in the exercise of rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act and has thereby engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the Act.
5. By refusing employment to A. T. Satchell on August 27 and October 19, 1957, PMA has discriminated against Satchell in violation of Section 8(a)(3) of the Act.6. By such discrimination PMA has interfered with, restrained, and coerced Satchell in the exercise of rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, and has thereby engaged in unfair labor practices violative of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act.7. The aforesaid unfair labor practices are unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.8. The evidence does not establish a violation of the Act on the part of the International.[Recommendations omitted from publication.] United Hatters, Cap & Millinery Workers International Union,AFL-CIO, its agents and Phillip Ross, Regional Director of the Union and E. J. Lipschutz, Samuel Rosenberg, Nathan Lipschutz, Sidney Lipschutz and Frank Lipschutz , doing business as Louisville Cap Company. Case No. 9-CB-398. April 2, 1959 DECISION AND ORDEROn December 12, 1958, Trial Examiner John C. Fisher issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondents had engaged in and were engaging in certain unfair labor practices, and recommending that they cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter the Respondents and the General Counsel filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and supporting briefs.The Board 1 has reviewed the rulings made by the Trial Examiner at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed.The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions and briefs, and the entire record in the case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner with the modifications and additions noted below.1. The complaint alleged, and the Trial Examiner found, that the object of the Respondent Union's picketing, customer appeals, and boycott cam...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
