Vulcan Forging Company And International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Uaw-cio, 621 (1949)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:Extract
Vulcan Forging Company And International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft And Agricultural Implement Workers Of America, Uaw-cio, 621 (1949)
In the Matter of VULCAN FORGING COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW-CIO Case No. 7-C-1769.-Decided August 10, 1949 DECISION AND ORDER On April 28, 1949, Trial Examiner Hamilton Gardner issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8 (a) (5) and Section 8 (a) (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter, the Respondent filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and a supporting brief. The Respondent's request for oral argument is hereby denied, as the record and brief, in our opinion, adequately present the issues and the positions of the parties.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, as amended, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Reynolds, Murdock, and Gray].The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner made at the hearing and finds no prejudicial error was committed.1 The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions and brief, and the entire record in this case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner with the additions and exceptions herein noted.1In footnote 1 of his Intermediate Report the Trial Examiner stated that a motion by the Respondent for the dismiss...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
30 cfr 780.18 - reclamation plan: general requirements. | 29 USC 1051 Sec 1051 Coverage | 18 USC 3266 Sec 3266 Regulations | palace exploration company plaintiff-appellant v petroleum development company defendant-appellee. 374 f.3d 951 10th cir 2004 | sentencia nº 2544 de consiglio di stato may 19 2009 | sentencia nº 1697 de consiglio di stato, march 31, 2008 | Sentencia nº 1988 de Consiglio di Stato, April 22, 2009 | sentencia nº 4820 de consiglio di stato september 17 2008