Wood, Wire and Metal Lathers International Union, 574 (1951)
National Labor Relations Board
Linked as:
Extract
Wood, Wire and Metal Lathers International Union, 574 (1951)
ployees vote 'yes' to the first question, indicating their wish to be included in a unit with the nonprofessional employees, they will be so included. Their votes on the second question will then be counted together with the votes of the nonprofessional voting group (a) to decide their representative for the Employer-wide unit described in group (a), and the Regional Director conducting the election directed herein is instructed to issue a certification of representatives to the labor organization for whom a majority of the employees voting cast their ballots. If, on the other hand, a majority of the professional employees voting in group (c) vote against inclusion, they will not be included with the nonprofessional employees, and their votes on the second question will then be counted to decide whether and which labor organization they want to represent them in a separate professional Unit.Y8 [Text of Direction of Elections omitted from publication in this volume.] 38 Ohio Steel Foundry Company, 92 NLRB 683. .
WOOD, WIRE AND METAL LATHERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL No.234, AFL and AcousTI ENGINEERING COMPANY WOOD, WIRE AND METAL LATHERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL No.234, AFL and LATHING AND PLASTERING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF ATLANTA. Cases Nos. 10-CC-f 4 and 10-CC-25. December 18, 1951Decision and Order On September 14, 1951, Trial Examiner George A. Downing issued his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent had engaged in and was engaging in certain unfair labor practices, and recommending that it cease and desist therefrom and take certain affirmative action, as set forth in the copy of the Intermediate Report attached hereto. Thereafter the Respondent filed exceptions to the Intermediate Report and a supporting brief.The Board 1 has reviewed the rulings made by the Trial Examiner at the hearing and finds that no prejudicial error was committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. The Board has considered the Intermediate Report, the exceptions and brief, and the entire record in the 1 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Murdock].97 NLRB No. 84.WOOD, WIRE AND METAL LATHERS INTERNATIONAL UNION 575 case, and hereby adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Trial Examiner, with the following additions and corrections 51. We agree with the Trial Examiner that the Board has jurisdiction of this proceeding a and that it will effectuate the policies of the Act to assert such jurisdiction.42. In adopting the Trial Examiner's finding that the Respondent Union violated Section 8 (b) (4) (A) and (B) of the Act, we do not rely on its refusal to furnish lathers to Seibold for the completion of the Goodyear Rubber job. We find it unnecessary at this time to decide whether this refusal constituted a violation of the secondary boycott provisions of the Act.3. We reject as without merit the Respondent Union's contention that, because the lathers continued to work for the lathing subcontractors on jobs other than those at the Atlanta Journal and Standard Oil buildings, no work stoppag...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
