SJT Holdings d/b/a/ McDonald's, (2023)

• Date: 15 August 2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

SJT HOLDINGS, INC., MCDONALD’S

USA, LLC, AND MCDONALD’S

CORP.

and

Case 20-CA-310742

SEIU NATIONAL FAST FOOD

WORKERS UNION

ORDER1

SJT Holdings, Inc.’s (SJT) Petition to Revoke Subpoena Duces Tecum No. B-1-

1IWAIVB and McDonald’s USA, LLC and McDonald’s Corp.’s (McDonald’s) Petition to

Revoke Subpoena Duces Tecum No. B-1-1IWBE8R are denied. The subpoenas seek

information relevant to the mattersunder investigation and describe with sufficient particularity

the evidence sought, as required by Section 11(1) of the National Labor Relations Act and

Section 102.31(b) of the Board’s Rules and Regulations. Further, the Petitioners have failed to

establish any other legal basis for revoking the subpoenas.2 See generally NLRB v. North Bay

1 The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-

member panel. Member Wilcox did not participate in this case.

McDonald’s moves to recuse Member Prouty based on his former employment with

SEIU Local 32BJ, making substantially the same arguments that it raised in Case 20-CA-

277353, which involves the same parties. Respondent SJT Holdings, Inc. joinsin this motion, as

it did the previous one. In consultation with the Designated Agency Ethics Official, Member

Prouty has considered the motion and has determined not to recuse himself for the same reasons

he set forth in the order denying petitions to revoke in 20-CA-277353. See SJT Holdings, Inc.,

McDonald’s USA, LLC, and McDonald’s Corp., 372 NLRB No. 82, slip op. at 1 fn. 1 (2023).

2 To the extent SJT has provided some of the requested material, it is not required to produce

that information again, so long as it accurately describes which documents under subpoena it has

already provided, states whether those previously supplied documents constitute all of the

requested documents, and provides all of the information that was subpoenaed.